Evo Slim Official Website › Journal › Twenty-Five Milligrams Of Taurine, And Twelve Studies

Twenty-Five Milligrams Of Taurine, And Twelve Studies

Reviewed by Dr. Meetal Mehta

Taurine is the last row on this panel and the most recognisable name on it. The pooled human trials used half a gram to six grams a day, and found no effect on body mass index at any of it.

The last row on the panel

L-Taurine, 25 mg, dagger. It is the twentieth and final entry on this label, and it is the one most likely to be recognised by a reader who has never looked at a supplement panel before, because taurine is on the side of every energy drink in every shop.

Taurine is an amino acid, although not one of the twenty that build proteins. The body makes it, principally in the liver, and the diet supplies more of it: meat, fish and shellfish are the main sources, and a typical mixed diet provides somewhere in the region of forty to four hundred milligrams a day depending on what is on the plate.

That last figure is the one to hold onto while reading the rest of this post.

What the studies used

A meta-analysis of twelve studies pooled the human trials of taurine supplementation. The populations were mostly people with liver or metabolic conditions: diabetes, hepatitis, fatty liver, obesity, cystic fibrosis, chronic alcoholism and cardiac surgery.

The doses ranged from 0.5 grams to 6 grams a day, for periods between fifteen days and six months. That is five hundred milligrams at the very bottom of the range and six thousand at the top.

The pooled results were mixed and they are worth stating precisely rather than summarising. Systolic blood pressure fell by about 4.67 mmHg. Diastolic fell by about 2.90. Total cholesterol fell by about 10.87 mg/dl and triglycerides by about 13.05. Fasting blood glucose did not move. HDL did not move. LDL did not move significantly. And body mass index did not move.

Two gaps, not one

The arithmetic gap is the obvious one. Twenty-five milligrams is a twentieth of the smallest amount any of those trials used, and a two-hundred-and-fortieth of the largest.

The second gap matters more and gets mentioned less. Even at five hundred to six thousand milligrams a day, the pooled analysis found no effect on body mass index. The outcomes that did move were blood pressure and two lipid measures, in populations selected for metabolic and liver conditions.

So the question is not only whether 25 mg is enough. It is what it would be enough for. A weight management panel carrying an ingredient whose best evidence is about blood pressure, at a twentieth of the dose that produced it, is making a connection the literature does not.

The comparison nobody makes

Here is the awkward arithmetic for any taurine row on any supplement panel.

A hundred grams of chicken thigh carries in the region of a hundred and seventy milligrams of taurine. Scallops and mussels carry considerably more. A single ordinary meal containing meat or seafood delivers several times what this capsule does, without anybody thinking about it.

That is not an argument that supplemental taurine is pointless. It is an argument that 25 mg of it is not a meaningful addition to a diet that contains any animal protein at all, and that a vegan diet, which genuinely is low in taurine, would need rather more than 25 mg to change anything.

The same test is worth applying to any familiar ingredient on any panel: what would a normal day of eating supply, and how does the capsule compare? For the minerals on this label the answer is favourable. For the taurine it is not.

Why a token row exists

Three reasons, and only the third is objectionable.

1. Mass budget. A single capsule holds a finite amount. Once magnesium has taken 125 mg and the two 50 mg botanicals another hundred, what is left has to cover fifteen more entries.
2. Recognition. Taurine is a name buyers know, and a familiar name on a panel of unfamiliar ones does work that has nothing to do with pharmacology.
3. Label length. Twenty ingredients reads as more comprehensive than seven, whatever the amounts. This is the reason worth being wary of, and it is why the first habit the checklist teaches is to read the amounts rather than count the names.

None of that makes a token row dishonest, so long as the amount is printed. A panel that hid 25 mg of taurine inside a proprietary blend would be a different matter entirely, and that is the practice worth objecting to.

How to spot a token row

Four signs, and any two of them together is usually enough.

• It is near the bottom of the panel. Panels are conventionally ordered by amount within their blocks.
• The amount is a round small number. 3 mg, 10 mg, 25 mg. Formulation amounts that come from a trial rarely land so neatly.
• The literature uses grams. Taurine, glucomannan, creatine and most amino acids are gram-scale ingredients, and a milligram figure beside one of them is a gesture.
• A normal meal supplies more. The diet comparison above settles it faster than any trial does.

On this panel that test flags the taurine at 25 mg, the gymnema at 3 mg and the white mulberry at 3 mg. It does not flag the chromium, the magnesium or the zinc, which is exactly the split the dosage comparison arrives at from the other direction.

The finding that did hold up

It would be a poor post that spent nine paragraphs on what taurine did not do and skipped what it did.

Across those twelve studies, systolic blood pressure fell by about 4.67 mmHg and diastolic by about 2.90. Those are not trivial numbers in the context of blood pressure research, where a few millimetres of mercury sustained across a population is a meaningful public health figure. Total cholesterol fell by about 10.87 mg/dl and triglycerides by about 13.05.

Three caveats travel with them and all three matter. The populations were selected for metabolic and liver conditions rather than drawn from the general public. The doses ran from half a gram to six grams a day. And a meta-analysis of twelve studies with that much heterogeneity in population and dose is a signal rather than a settled finding.

None of it speaks to 25 mg in a weight management capsule, and none of it speaks to body weight at all, which the same analysis looked for and did not find. But it is the reason taurine is studied, and a post that implied the ingredient itself was uninteresting would be making the opposite error to the one it is correcting.

The general lesson is worth keeping. An ingredient can have real evidence behind it and still be on the wrong panel, at the wrong amount, for the wrong outcome. NCCIH on using dietary supplements wisely makes that point across the category rather than for any one row.

The verdict on the twentieth row

Twenty-five milligrams of taurine is a token amount of an ingredient whose best human evidence is about blood pressure rather than body weight, at a twentieth of the smallest dose that produced it, in a body that already makes taurine and a diet that already supplies more.

It is printed, which is the thing that matters most, because a printed amount is an amount you can argue with. Thirteen of the twenty entries on this label are marked with a dagger and every one of them still carries a figure, and the panel is reproduced in full on this website rather than summarised.

Read the top of the panel for the reasons to buy it and the bottom for the reasons to keep expectations modest. Both halves are on the same label, which is more than can be said for most of this category.